In similar respect, this means that Freds effect on the coincedental particles relate to whether they are bound to their result or whether they are not, this means that if they are bound the coincedence will occure and if they are not it shall not, but depending on distance + chance instead of a simple on off switch. Such that the effect is emulated with whether or not aleaf will move per will to.
However, Fred's effect isn't more then this, because his capacity is only in deciding the change of bounds and reactions, decided by his change in scales, such that the actual bonding of the reactions and other qualities of coincedental particles are decided by the projector itself.
What is unique about this is that the change in fred effects a random set of objects in consideration, such that when Fred changes the result is a change in a randomly selected group of reacting or bound objects any unnaffected are not effected.
This basically means that Fred when changing his scales, causes random people to die or causes a reaction when experimenting or making chemicals, either coincedentally or perposely and this can happen at any time. This suggests the best way to protect oneself is to avoid the projectors light, by avoiding its selection of you as the coming change.
This can be done by ensuring health, as it cannot selected someone who isn't close to death in reaction ( due to other constraints of action ) ( things rarely go from reaction to not suddenly, rather they move towards it )
This does begin to help me understand the basics of what is in the projector itself aswell, specifically that of the scaffolding, since it implies that the reaction rules and coincedental selection processes are held within the projector puncture which implies greater understanding in the Projector itself.
Thus I will draw a model of what I think is held within the projector and explain it in more detail!
The projector decides what is going to actually react and what is reacting right now or later. Two different concepts related to two different forms of projection lamps.
Scaffolding projectors contain two lamps, one in relation to what will react accordingly ( such as the fact that vinegar and baking soda do react ) called the Reactionary lamp and the when wich related chemicals will react in time lamp called the Timocation lamp.
What essentially occurs is that the Reactionary Lamp contains the rules of what can react at any time, while the Timocation lamp measures when Fred has changed and relates this to which things will then change, such that the result is essentially the conditional chance that if it can react and is chosen to react it will then react.
Can and selection are these two lamps processing shades and thus are a part of the whole processing ability of each inherent scaffolding particle. Still a better explanantion of how this occurs is requires, since it appears that a reaction occurs when made to occur, but this is the result of coincedental bounds, which are also related to this set of projection lamps.
Such that can lamp ( Reactionary ) states that this can be bound to this result, while the Timocation lamps suggests in selection that is shall infact result in said bound and reaction.
However, their is much not yet explained by this model and several questions concerning various parts of this model, such as whether or not the number of scales is relevant somehow, and what exactly is the makeup and behavior of these lamps and their shades, and if motion related to Fred himself is relevant in someway. A question for another time, as I am making and working on the next portion of this model ( space )
Thus in conclusion, Fred's 4 dimensional alternation of red and yellow scales ( material and coincedence ) cause the trigger which results in reaction and bounds of objects in reality, decided by the Reactionary and Timocation lamps within the projector. Causing things like chemical reaction and death in the body and randomly occuring events in reality.
Note that this is unrelated and related to the mind in soe form, but that will be better understood later.
No comments:
Post a Comment